These are my thoughts on the decision being made July 17th by the city on the future of the golf course. Two choices are being presented by the hired consultant and the stakeholders committee. 

One plan keeps a compromised course that would most certainly doom golf, eliminating the driving range and shortening several holes. It seems this plan has given no consideration to income derived with proper management, maintenance, and promotion. A main concern has been the use of water. A new well has reduced costs by 75 percent.

There is an alternate hybrid plan by Robert Horner that addresses almost all of the interests of both the non-golfing community and our many local golfers. It keeps our little gem of a course, designed by a renowned golf course planner  in the 1920s that remains a respected layout to this day. Mr. Horner’s plan is currently not being considered. This is a shame, it could be a win-win for everyone.

In recent years the course has suffered from benign neglect by the city. Most serious golfers have become discouraged by the poor current conditions. If the city could offer a decent lease it could once again become the asset it has historically been. 

This is one of the few courses where beginners, kids, the high school golf team, and people of limited means can enjoy a healthy walk while playing a fun and challenging game with family and friends.

Come out, hit some range balls, have a cold beverage and maybe lunch. Please join me in imploring the city to put off making a decision on July 17 without seriously considering all of the options. Our historic golf course is too valuable to carve away.

Gary Jonland
PORT TOWNSEND