Your Dec. 31 coverage of Warren Shelley-Rose’s unexpected death, only a few days earlier, is horribly insensitive and inappropriate. Yes, authorities searched for and found him: that can be …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you had an active account on our previous website, then you have an account here. Simply reset your password to regain access to your account.
If you did not have an account on our previous website, but are a current print subscriber, click here to set up your website account.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
* Having trouble? Call our circulation department at 360-385-2900, or email our support.
Please log in to continue |
|
Your Dec. 31 coverage of Warren Shelley-Rose’s unexpected death, only a few days earlier, is horribly insensitive and inappropriate. Yes, authorities searched for and found him: that can be “news.” But what a shocking breach of privacy to mine Facebook for unnecessary financial and medical information, and to use photos without permission, even photos of them transporting his dead body – photos we his family hadn’t seen and surely didn’t want published.
Shameful, invasive, unethical.
The innuendo of the headline “police have not ruled anything out,” which does not even appear in the article. Focus on the logistics of moving the body, as if it were an object, not a human being.
Tabloid. Unacceptable!
Maraiah Lynn Nadeau
Port Townsend
