Wow! The Leader’s editorial clarifying its letter submission policy, once again explicitly “open to the ideas of others,” was very well considered and articulated.
During …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you had an active account on our previous website, then you have an account here. Simply reset your password to regain access to your account.
If you did not have an account on our previous website, but are a current print subscriber, click here to set up your website account.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
* Having trouble? Call our circulation department at 360-385-2900, or email our support.
Please log in to continue |
|
Wow! The Leader’s editorial clarifying its letter submission policy, once again explicitly “open to the ideas of others,” was very well considered and articulated.
During the lockdown repression initiated in 2020, a number of commentators noticed and protested a strange change in local media, which increasingly slow-walked and rejected dissenting opinions in their letter columns. See the Port Townsend Free Press article “Of Covid Testing, ‘Misinformation’ and Censorship” for the full story.
I got the strong impression at one point that this censorship was in part, a response to outside pressure, either economic or from above. If this pressure came from government actors (as documented to have occurred nationally by Glenn Greenwald, the “Twitter Files,” etc.), then that indeed “abused its First Amendment right to protect those views” as the Leader’s editorial aptly states.
Thanks again for restoring “Glasnost” (openness) to the Leader’s letter pages instead of functioning like “Pravda” (a ministry of truth).