The opinion piece “Moving forward with a shared vision” about the Port Townsend Food Co-op Board claims objectivity but skews the narrative, devaluing the Co-op Board without giving them …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you had an active account on our previous website, then you have an account here. Simply reset your password to regain access to your account.
If you did not have an account on our previous website, but are a current print subscriber, click here to set up your website account.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
* Having trouble? Call our circulation department at 360-385-2900, or email our support.
Please log in to continue |
|
The opinion piece “Moving forward with a shared vision” about the Port Townsend Food Co-op Board claims objectivity but skews the narrative, devaluing the Co-op Board without giving them an equal platform.
Establishing Apparent Objectivity: Jason Serinus starts by discussing the success of Jefferson County’s Healthy Together Task Force, creating the impression of objectivity. By including quotes from Greg Brotherton, Serinus appears balanced but uses this positive example as contrast to the Co-op Board.
Bias Through Selective Framing: Serinus shifts to the Co-op Board, highlighting conflict and dysfunction, positioning them negatively without pause for deeper inquiry. Words like “fracture” and “alienating” carry negative connotations, blaming the Co-op Board for discord.
Lack of Opportunity for Redemption: The piece does not promote equal investigation, or allow for the Co-op Board’s perspective. By not including insights from board members, Serinus denies them a voice. The narrative focuses on Cameron Jones’ perspective, portraying him as a victim. There is no room in this rhetoric for repair or redemption, only demands and accusations.
Contradiction Between Opening and Closing: Initially, the piece claims to seek understanding by exploring dynamics. However, by the end, Serinus takes a definitive stance against the Co-op Board, contradicting the initial claim of seeking a broader perspective.
Missing Full Picture: Serinus does not explore the complexities faced by the Co-op Board, reducing the situation to a simple good-versus-bad moralistic narrative
Steps Toward Constructive Resolution: To move forward, it is crucial for everyone involved to take responsibility and avoid remaining in an inflamed, retaliatory stance. The situation calls for both equanimity and self-responsibility, recognizing that everyone has roles in repair. By fostering mutual inquiry and open communication, the Co-op Board and Cameron Jones can transform loss of face, anger and hurt into something more productive for everyone.
Sidonie Wilson
Port Townsend