‘We want better pay’

Port Townsend school workers demand higher wages

Posted 1/13/22

Around 40 demonstrators gathered outside the Port Townsend School District’s front office on Blaine Street Thursday evening to protest school wages for paraeducators, custodians, bus drivers, …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

E-mail
Password
Log in
‘We want better pay’

Port Townsend school workers demand higher wages

Posted

Around 40 demonstrators gathered outside the Port Townsend School District’s front office on Blaine Street Thursday evening to protest school wages for paraeducators, custodians, bus drivers, and other classified employees at Salish Coast Elementary, Blue Heron Middle School, and Port Townsend High.

Classified school staff, represented by the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Local 925, decided to demonstrate after the collective bargaining agreement between the union and the school district for higher wages and better benefits has stalled over the past six months.

“We have been negotiating since May of 2021 trying to get better wages; livable wages,” said Amy Recker, chapter president of SEIU Local 925.

“A first year paraeducator makes less than $15 an hour. You can make more money working at McDonald’s than you can up here,” Recker said.

With signs in hand, the demonstrators cheered and chanted before the school district’s board of directors meeting late last week.

Chants of “What do we want? Fair wages. When do we want it? Now,” echoed between picketers and union leaders shortly before the meeting started.

The largest contention between staff and school district administrators hovers around wages. Many on the union’s side feel they are being underpaid and overworked. All three schools under the district have experienced shortages in staff, according to union leaders, and many staff members and advocates mentioned the district’s starting wage rates as a factor keeping new hires away.

The school district said earlier it was committed to a fair and equitable contract settlement.

Still, the impasse has stretched into 2022.

“We need to have fair wages that are compatible to other jobs in our county, because we cant get staff. We can’t get staff because we don’t have fair wages right now; I think our biggest fight right now is the wages,” said union demonstrator Tara Clanton.

“It feels like we have some of the most demanding and pressured roles, but we’re some of the least valued employees,” said Laura Cornell, a protester at the gathering. “All of us are doing the job of two to three people every day. There are a lot more stresses and pressures just from dealing with COVID.”

The school district released an update letter to parents and staff on their website in early December, addressing the collective bargaining agreement situation and posting the proposed wage rates from the union as well as current proposed rates from the district.

In their letter, the district states: “Unfortunately the district and SEIU have not been able to reach agreement on the issues outstanding between them, including salaries.”

“The district is balancing our desire to recognize staff’s value and to attract and retain quality employees against the limitations on district funding available to pay employees,” the district continued.

The current hourly wages for paraeducators and classified staff are significantly less than both proposed rates from the SEIU Local 925 union and the school district. The current mean average hourly wage of paraeducators and classified staff, comprised of bus drivers, custodians, groundskeepers, and other positions, is $18.27.

The mean average proposed salary rates from the SEIU is $20.72, while the mean average rates proposed by the school district is $20.37.

The increase in wages (by using the district’s proposed salary changes) would cost the school district approximately $190,000 in the first year over current wages, according to the district.

“The district is committed to reaching a fair and equitable contract settlement with its SEIU — represented classified employees — providing them with significant salary increases while also respecting the serious constraints faced by the district in addressing multiple other priorities and demands within the context of its limited financial resources,” the school district’s update letter said.

After reading the update, some school staff members were unhappy with how the collective bargaining agreement was portrayed by administrators.

“The statement that this ‘district is committed to reaching a fair and equitable contract settlement’ is false. The last time we were given a raise was because some posted wages were below [the] minimum wage. We are one of the lowest paid classified staffs in Western Washington,” Recker told the school board.

“I applaud your attempt at being transparent but am disappointed that you chose to post such a one-sided letter. If the letter is any indication, you have no idea what is going on with your classified staff,” she added.

Ten additional people made public comments in front of the board of directors, with a variety of school staff adding remarks.

“Currently, Port Townsend drivers make $18.91 an hour and Chimacum starts their drivers at $22.55. Why would a driver come to work for Port Townsend when there are better wages and more hours offered to them in Chimacum?” asked Bethel Moore, a bus driver for the Port Townsend School District.

“You have to look at how understaffed we are and underpaid. The pay isn’t everything, but it sure helps,” said secretary Lisa Anderson.

Presently, the collective bargaining agreement contract is still in limbo between union organizers and school district administrators. The board of directors’ next business meeting is Jan. 20, where directors will likely discuss the ongoing contract dispute.

Comments

4 comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here

  • Catto

    These employees give so much love, effort, and energy to our children and our community, and for so little. Many jobs have significantly lower expectations, risks, and qualifications, and yet pay more. Do we really want intelligent, decent, and caring people gradually driven from their profession by this kind of stinginess? We are not botching hamburgers here, but children who will someday be our peers and caretakers. We should pay according to these jobs' importance.

    Thursday, January 13 Report this

  • phil.cotton777

    Alot of it has to do with Dems running our country in reverse, I don't know how people can even live on 15$-20$ an hour it would be impossible for my family and I to do so

    Monday, January 17 Report this

  • Dcc

    Thanks for making it political, Phil.

    Tuesday, January 18 Report this

  • ecorep

    Of course its political Dcc, but everything doesn't need to be partisan. Partisanship creates grid lock and limits the ability of governments and other public administrations from maintaining healthy relationships with all the community. Polarization has ripped this country apart. Phil could have said the "antigrowth coalition" that is keeping Hadlock from becoming the affordable and resilient community that it could be.

    Wednesday, January 19 Report this