The following is my personal opinion and not that of the Envisioning PT Golf Course and Mountain View Commons stakeholder’s committee, of which I am a member. 

For nearly 30 years, I’ve walked, biked, or drove around the PT golf course and wondered what it would be like if this 56-acre city-owned property were accessible to more than a small minority of the population. 

With respect to golfers, the PT golf course has never been a “public” space, as yard signs claim. Unlike truly public spaces where everyone is welcome, the golf course is reserved exclusively for golfers, and severely limits the number of people that can utilize the space at any time.

The golf course is also not “green” or “open.” Yes, it has trees and grass, and yes, you can see into it, but it is a highly manufactured, unnatural space with relatively few native plants and very little animal habitat. Instead, it requires large quantities of water (which the city pays for) as well as significant fossil fuel consumption (and pollution) in the form of gas-guzzling mowers. Contrast this with a possible city park that utilizes permaculture design in support of climate resiliency all while providing ample walking, biking, and other athletic opportunities for everyone.

The city is currently exploring the future of the golf course. Drawing upon a recent study by the National Golf Foundation, which recommends approximately $1 million in repairs and upgrades, the city is now faced with a decision. Do we sink more public money into the golf course, or do we instead choose inclusivity, increased recreational opportunities, as well as environmental health and resiliency? 

Please visit cityofpt.us and click on the “Envision PT Golf Course” button. There you’ll find info about the city’s decision-making process, schedule, as well as an online comment form.

Gabe Van Lelyveld
PORT TOWNSEND